Over on Forbes, I provide a discussion of nine key takeaways from the first three days of trial in O'Bannon v. NCAA. Among other things, I discuss why it was a smart move by plaintiffs' lawyers to choose a bench trial rather than a jury trial, why NCAA licensing restraints are not analogous to the rules of Little League broadcast licensing, and areas in coaching Ed O'Bannon as a witness where the plaintiffs' lawyers could have improved.
The full article is available here.
Analyzing Days 1-3 of the O'Bannon v. NCAA Trial
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment