Over at Forbes, I wrote this morning about why aspects of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's decision in the 'Penn State' case were wrongly decided. In the article, I explain that the court made dubious presumptions that the NCAA is not a commercial actor (a longstanding mistake of the Third Circuit) and that the NCAA president's actions are not innately concerted.
Here is a link to the full article, discussing both points in far greater detail.
Why the District Court's Ruling in 'Penn State' was Legally Wrong
2:00 PM |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment